= one of the main points of the lecture
|
 |
Some
Reference Points for Discussion
|
Preliminary Class Business
- Meeting this Friday for "specialization" in Literature
and the Culture of Information: see announcement
on English Dept. Web site for details
|
 |
 |
|
From Prehistorical Information to the History
of Information
| Borgmann |
natural signs |
conventional
(cultural) signs |
technological
signs |
digital
signs? |
| Benjamin |
natural objects
(aura) |
traditional
objects (aura) |
modern media |
digital
signs? |
| |
Prehistory
of Information |
The
History of Information |
- The purpose of this week's classes is to leave behind the
prehistory of information to embark upon a review of the history
of information, specifically, the history of previous "information
revolutions" that can be studied to gain insight into our
current information revolution:
- The Writing Revolution
Transition from primary oral culture to writing ("chirographic,"
manuscript) culture
- The Print Revolution
Transition from manuscript culture to print culture
- The Media Revolution
Transition from print culture to electronic audiovisual
culture
- The Digital Revolution
Transition from analog, broadcast audiovisual culture to
digital, networked culture
(See, for example, Carol Pasternack's English
165SS, "Scroll to Screen" for a fuller examination
of the history of information)
- The paradox we encounter in studying the history of
information:
- (A) We are helped
in understanding previous ages of information because the
history of information is not one in which each successive
paradigm simply erases the board and starts over again.
Rather, each new epoch of information retains important
elements of previous epochs that are reconfigured and repositioned
in the evolving system of information (what might be called
the evolving "ecology of information").
| "Today the three
kinds of information [natural, conventional, technological]
are layered over one another in one place, grind against
each other in a second place, and are heaved and folded
up in a third." (Borgmann, p. 2) |
It is the residue of earlier information practices in our
own information ecology that allows us to empathize with
the past.
- (B) But it is also
precisely our assumption that we can understand past information
practices based on the retention of reconfigured versions
of those practices that prevents us from really understanding
earlier information ages as they were actually lived in
their own ecologies.
|
| (Continued
in next lecture) |
 |
|